Disclosure: On this site you won’t find specific advice on “how to call function xyz()”. Interpreting C++ ARM and #pragma dwim is also out of scope.
We’re treating our readers as intelligent beings who can use Google and/or StackOverflow, where all such specific questions were answered more than once.
What you will find is opinions, more opinions, and even more opinions on all the aspects of software development - and with a large chunk of them based on real-world experience too.
Your mileage may vary. Batteries not included.
A Model for Debug Complexity
May 1, 2013 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
A humble attempt to make some approximation of debug complexity.
Quote:
Our model shows that coupling is a bad thing for debugging complexity, so we can consider this sanity check to be passed
Filed under: On.ProgrammingDebugging
Read more‘No Bugs’ Top Five C++ Cooking Recipes
March 1, 2013 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
When cooking a C++ program, there are a few spices to consider.
Quote:
"If strict weak ordering is violated, all kinds of weird things can happen: from identical multiple entries in a supposedly-unique collection, to memory corruption
Filed under: On.ProgrammingTips and Tricks
Read more(640K) 2^256 Bytes of Memory is More than Anyone Would Ever (Need) Get
January 1, 2013 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
Physics imposes hard limits on amount of memory we will get in foreseeable future.
Quote:
Even if every memory cell can be represented by a single atom, we would need 1 to 10% of all the stars and planets which we can see , to implement 2^256 bytes of memory.
Filed under: On.System ArchitectureRequirement analysis
Read moreKeep It Simple, Singleton!
November 1, 2012 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
Naïve mappings from business domain to programmer domain tend to survive requirement changes better
Quote:
How do we distinguish good assumptions from bad ones?
Filed under: On.System ArchitectureDesign decisionsOn.DevelopmentDevelopment Philosophy
Read more



