Disclosure: On this site you won’t find specific advice on “how to call function xyz()”. Interpreting C++ ARM and #pragma dwim is also out of scope.
We’re treating our readers as intelligent beings who can use Google and/or StackOverflow, where all such specific questions were answered more than once.
What you will find is opinions, more opinions, and even more opinions on all the aspects of software development - and with a large chunk of them based on real-world experience too.
Your mileage may vary. Batteries not included.
Bringing Architecture of Operating Systems to XXI Century – Part III. Basic Ideas
May 9, 2019 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Quote:
everything in the system should be a Finite State Machine (FSM)
Another Quote:
‘OS’ is not understood as ‘OS kernel’, but rather is defined by the apps which can run on it
Filed under: On.System ArchitectureDesign decisions(Re)ActorsOn.ProgrammingEmbedded
Read moreBringing Architecture of Operating Systems to XXI Century – Part II. Desirable Improvements
April 24, 2019 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Quote:
low-end versions of the new OS should be lean enough to run on a ~$1 MCU (these days ~=4K RAM, 32K ROM)
Another Quote:
last N minutes of the life of the production program before crashing, should be replayable on my development box.
Filed under: On.System ArchitectureRequirement analysis(Re)ActorsOn.HardwareMCU
Read moreBringing Architecture of Operating Systems to XXI Century – Part I. Changes in IT Over Last 50 Years
April 15, 2019 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Quote:
we’re using operating systems which were designed whopping 40-50 years from now
Another Quote:
Do not communicate by sharing memory; instead, share memory by communicating.
Filed under: On.System ArchitectureRequirement analysis(Re)ActorsOn.DevelopmentDevelopment Philosophy
Read more



