Disclosure: On this site you won’t find specific advice on “how to call function xyz()”. Interpreting C++ ARM and #pragma dwim is also out of scope.
We’re treating our readers as intelligent beings who can use Google and/or StackOverflow, where all such specific questions were answered more than once.
What you will find is opinions, more opinions, and even more opinions on all the aspects of software development - and with a large chunk of them based on real-world experience too.
Your mileage may vary. Batteries not included.
Once Again on TCP vs UDP
March 21, 2016 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
The choice of TCP over UDP (or vice versa) might not always be obvious. In a sense, replacing TCP with UDP is trading off reliability for interactivity.
Quote:
The most critical factor in selection of TCP over UDP or vice versa is usually related to acceptable delays
Filed under: On.ProgrammingNetwork Programming
Read moreOn Zero-Side-Effect Interactive Programming, Actors, and FSMs
March 14, 2016 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
“WHY are functional programming languages not popular for interactive programming purposes?" and "WHAT we can do about it?"
Quote:
IMNSHO, deterministic Actors are the very best thing in existence for interactive programming, with lots of very practical benefits (from production post-mortem, to protection of in-memory state against server faults).
Filed under: On.System Architecture(Re)Actors
Read morePassword Hashing: Why and How
March 7, 2016 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
Password hashing is a Big Headache, and doing it right is complicated
Quote:
Note that none of the C++11 random number engines (LCG, Mersenne-Twister, or Lagged Fibonacci) can be considered good enough for cryptographic purposes – in short, they’re way too predictable and can be broken by a determined attacker, given enough output has leaked.
Filed under: On.SecurityBest Practices
Read morePre-Coding Checklist: Things Everybody Hates, but Everybody Needs Them Too. From Source Control to Coding Guidelines
February 29, 2016 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Quote:
The basic idea behind Continuous Integration is simple: as soon as you commit something, a build is automatically run with all the tests you were able to invent by that time
Another Quote:
One thing which should be noted about agile criticisms, is that there is no real disagreement about what needs to be done; the sentiment in such criticisms is usually more along the lines of “we’re doing it anyway, so do we need fancy names and external consultants?
Filed under: Book: D&D of MOGs1st beta of Vol. I-IIIOn.DevelopmentDevelopment Processes




