“No Bugs” Bunny
“No Bugs” Bunny
Sarcastic Architect
Hobbies: Thinking Aloud, Arguing with Managers, Annoying HRs, Calling a Spade a Spade, Keeping Tongue in Cheek
Once upon a time, in a rabbit outsourcing warren of Bunnylore, there was a young software developer bunny. And as a developer, she has had one very unusual treat: she was obsessed with eliminating all the bugs she can get his forelegs on. So, it is not surprising that her friends called her a “No Bugs” Bunny (or simply “NoBugs”).
Later on, she grew up, so she decided that “Bunny” in her name has became inappropriate (not to mention potential arguments with Warner Brothers), so she has asked all her friends to call her “No Bugs” Bunny. She has made a career as a team lead and software architect, and they lived happily ever after.
Bringing Architecture of Operating Systems to XXI Century – Part I. Changes in IT Over Last 50 Years
April 15, 2019 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Quote:
we’re using operating systems which were designed whopping 40-50 years from now
Another Quote:
Do not communicate by sharing memory; instead, share memory by communicating.
Filed under: On.System ArchitectureRequirement analysis(Re)ActorsOn.DevelopmentDevelopment Philosophy
Read moreProgramming Languages As a Social Network
January 27, 2019 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
The Idea Recently, I was thinking about visualizing relations among different programming languages, and a thought has crossed my mind: Methodology I took quite a few more-or-less popular programming languages (33 to be exact); however, I explicitly restricted myself to more-or-less general-purpose programming languages. This eliminated DSLs such as R, as well as all dialects ...
Filed under: On.ProgrammingProgramming Languages
Java vs C++: Trading UB for Semantic Memory Leaks (Same Problem, Different Punishment for Failure)
October 30, 2018 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Quote:
with all due disrespect to mutable static/global data, I have to say that the problem of semantic memory leaks is NOT restricted to statics
Another Quote:
semantics of good code is about the same regardless of Java/C++ choice
Filed under: On.ProgrammingProgramming Languages
Read moreC++: "model of the hardware" vs "model of the compiler"
October 3, 2018 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Quote:
we MUST NOT care about compiler internals beyond our task definition (which is based on (a) humans, and (b) hardware, that’s it).
Another Quote:
My problem with introducing a ‘model of the compiler’ into the picture, is that it can be used to justify pretty much anything without any relation to real-world requirements.
Filed under: On.ProgrammingProgramming LanguagesOn.DevelopmentDevelopment Philosophy
Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast Ltd. © 2026. All rights reserved.
