“No Bugs” Bunny
“No Bugs” Bunny
Sarcastic Architect
Hobbies: Thinking Aloud, Arguing with Managers, Annoying HRs, Calling a Spade a Spade, Keeping Tongue in Cheek
Once upon a time, in a rabbit outsourcing warren of Bunnylore, there was a young software developer bunny. And as a developer, she has had one very unusual treat: she was obsessed with eliminating all the bugs she can get his forelegs on. So, it is not surprising that her friends called her a “No Bugs” Bunny (or simply “NoBugs”).
Later on, she grew up, so she decided that “Bunny” in her name has became inappropriate (not to mention potential arguments with Warner Brothers), so she has asked all her friends to call her “No Bugs” Bunny. She has made a career as a team lead and software architect, and they lived happily ever after.
Avoiding Ugly Afterthoughts. Part a. From Writing for Cross-Platform, to Writing for Debugging and Production Post-Mortem, with Error Handling in between
March 28, 2016 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Quote:
It is strongly recommended to have your build server to compile your game for at least two sufficiently-different platforms from the very beginning
Another Quote:
If allocation of 50 bytes causes an “out of memory” error, we’re probably already long dead because of unacceptable swapping. And even if we disabled swap file – chances that we will recover from this condition, are infinitesimally small
Filed under: Book: D&D of MOGs1st beta of Vol. IV-VIOn.System Architecture(Re)ActorsOn.ProgrammingDebugging
Read moreOnce Again on TCP vs UDP
March 21, 2016 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
The choice of TCP over UDP (or vice versa) might not always be obvious. In a sense, replacing TCP with UDP is trading off reliability for interactivity.
Quote:
The most critical factor in selection of TCP over UDP or vice versa is usually related to acceptable delays
Filed under: On.ProgrammingNetwork Programming
Read moreOn Zero-Side-Effect Interactive Programming, Actors, and FSMs
March 14, 2016 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
“WHY are functional programming languages not popular for interactive programming purposes?" and "WHAT we can do about it?"
Quote:
IMNSHO, deterministic Actors are the very best thing in existence for interactive programming, with lots of very practical benefits (from production post-mortem, to protection of in-memory state against server faults).
Filed under: On.System Architecture(Re)Actors
Read morePassword Hashing: Why and How
March 7, 2016 by • “No Bugs” Bunny
Abstract:
Password hashing is a Big Headache, and doing it right is complicated
Quote:
Note that none of the C++11 random number engines (LCG, Mersenne-Twister, or Lagged Fibonacci) can be considered good enough for cryptographic purposes – in short, they’re way too predictable and can be broken by a determined attacker, given enough output has leaked.
Filed under: On.SecurityBest Practices
Read more
Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast Ltd. © 2026. All rights reserved.
